This blog is a part of my body of research that seeks to analyse civil society's and academia's understanding of national security models from an academic perspective with a focus on Canada, Israel and the UK.
‘1968’ has come to stand for the years of seismic social transformation and political change that have significantly influenced our fundamental understanding of equal rights, sexual self-determination, political participation and freedom of expression pushed by the protest movements. Fifty years later, a majority of societies have elevated the memory of 1968 to a turning point for the realization of a new sphere of political community that has shaped our current ideals of democracy like no other experience. The ‘68 generation, however, was a not a uniform phenomenon but characterized by solidary fragmented, international black and POC civil rights and liberation movements, which have been woven into a Western-style anti-capitalist and leftist movement history in the current 1968 memory construct. Looking back at 1968 from today’s perspective, such a picture has left voids and blank spots behind, writing various movements and actors out of the memory of the majority societies.
Our event proposes new perspectives and uncovers hidden stories and voices of those who were present at the time and who had a significant impact in West and East Germany because of their historical involvement in anti-colonial, anti-racist and anti-imperialist struggles in Africa, Asia and the Americas. We want shed light on the political involvement of BPOC women*, with their first-hand experience of racism, experienced and perceived in those transformative years around 1968 in both German states. With their (life) stories and voices, it becomes possible to acquire a complex and multilayered understanding of both ‘68 itself and its influence on our understanding of current social and political events today.
Against the backdrop of our current challenges in countering a strengthening far right which is not only attacking the achievements of the ‘68 feminist and socialist movements, but also brazenly reframing them ethnically and thus appropriating them. It becomes particularly important, to show where and how the linking of dimensions of inequality and intersection of categories of difference were already actively practiced and demanded by different movements at that time. When we reflect on the kind of inclusive feminism we want to practice today, with whom we want to align ourselves, and from which perspectives onto history we want to learn and draw upon, we need to know the (life) stories of the BPOC women* and their contribution to social and political change at that time. In the tense environment of sexism and racism of the 1960s, they fought for self-determination, for the political collective recognition of their communities and were key actors in socio-cultural transformation processes that can be traced until today.
Participants:
Prof. Maisha Auma (educationalist)
Sevim Çelebi-Gottschlich (former member of the Berlin state parliament, activist)
Arfasse Gamada (psychologist)
Nicola Lauré Al-Samarai (cultural scientist)
Anita Awosusi (author, activist)
Isidora Randjelović (social education specialist, social worker)
Presenter: Peggy Piesche
Program:
6:00 pm Doors open, preview of the exhibition “Decolonize 1968! Interviews of BPOC Contemporary Witnesses”
6:15 pm Welcome by Peggy Piesche, representative of the Gunda Werner Institute: “Decolonize 1968! Interviews of BPOC Contemporary Witnesses” video trailer
6:30 pm “The Collective Wealth of Experience, 1968 – 2018: Interviews with BPOC Contemporary Witnesses”, Prof. Maisha Auma
Setting the tone musically: the String Archestra **
7:00 pm “Decolonize 1968! Interviews of BPOC Contemporary Witnesses”: video excerpt on Fasia Jansen
‘68 in Motion! Germany as a Diaspora: Sevim Celebi-Gottschlich, Arfasse Gamada and Nicola Lauré al-Samarai
7:30 pm “Decolonize 1968! Interviews of BPOC Contemporary Witnesses”: video excerpt on Ilona Lagrene
The Long ‘68ers: a conversation about the generation with Anita Awosusi and Isidora Randjelović
8:00 pm String Archestra and reception
** The String Orchestra (under the direction of Dr. Daniele G. Daude) is a classical string orchestra consisting of professional musicians of color. The orchestra was founded in Berlin in 2016. Its repertoire covers a wide range of periods – from early Baroque to contemporary music, as well as from Beethoven to Piazzolla – with special attention being paid to ‘unknown’ composers of color from Chevalier de Saint-George to Janelle Monáe.
Note:
BPOC stands for the political self-designation Black and People of Color, which takes up a shared experience of racism and integrates it into a collective alliance position. The asterisk (*) denotes the constructed quality of the category ‘woman’ and permits thinking about identities and self-positioning beyond the historically common and mostly ascribed designation practices (such as ‘women’ and ‘lesbians’) and thus provides scope for activists.
1. The Politics in the constructs of beauty
2. The Politics in the constructs of 'the female'
3. Again, the ability of the internet to with relative ease, to facilitate shared (and therefore by sheer number validate) narratives globally.
4. The continual communication of the narrative, 'your worth as a woman is skin deep'
5. The comodification of beauty
6. The comodification of 'whiteness'
7. For females the attainment of power through the emulation of constructs of beauty.
On this week: from 8-11 September listen in real-time as #AWIDForumspeakers address critical, multi-issue and cross-movement topics around our #FeministFutures.
This year the 13th AWID International Forum will feature live audio broadcasts of each of the five plenaries in 6 languages (Spanish, Portuguese, French, English, Russian, Arabic).
Janelle Monáe, left, Taraji P. Henson and Octavia Spencer in "Hidden Figures," which is slated for release in January.CreditHopper Stone/20th Century Fox
ATLANTA — Taraji P. Henson hates math, and Octavia Spencer has a paralyzing fear of calculus, but that didn't stop either actress from playing two of the most important mathematicians the world hasn't ever known.
Both women are starring in "Hidden Figures," a forthcoming film that tells the astonishing true story of female African-American mathematicians who were invaluable to NASA's space program in the Jim Crow South in the early 1960s.
Ms. Henson plays Katherine Johnson, a math savant who calculated rocket trajectories for, among other spaceflights, the Apollo trips to the moon. Ms. Spencer plays her supervisor, Dorothy Vaughan, and the R&B star Janelle Monáe plays Mary Jackson, a trailblazing engineer who worked at the agency, too.
Slated for wide release in January, the film is based on the book of the same title, to be published this fall, by Margot Lee Shetterly. The author grew up knowing Ms. Johnson in Hampton, Va., but only recently learned about her outsize impact on America's space race.
"I thought, oh my God, what is this we're hearing here?" Ms. Shetterly said, recalling the moment a few years back when her father, a retired research scientist, casually mentioned Ms. Johnson's life work. Her next thought: Why haven't we heard about it before?
"Hidden Figures" comes as Hollywood is under mounting pressure to diversify its offerings after this year's much criticized largely all-white Oscars race. And, while this picture has been in the works for several years, and the corresponding book for years before that, its filmmakers know it will invariably be lumped into post-#OscarsSoWhite chatter.
"It's not a reactionary movie," said Ted Melfi, the film's director, "but it will be seen as one, which is unfortunate."
Its evolution began two years ago, when the producer Donna Gigliotti, who won an Academy Award for "Shakespeare in Love," made an offer on the book's rights a day after reading Ms. Shetterly's proposal.
For Ms. Gigliotti, the "Hidden Figures" story line had everything and more: the Cold War, the space race, the damages of segregation and racial and gender inequality, all set against the country's burgeoning civil rights struggles.
Desperate to get ahead of the Russians, the nation's space agency had hired the brainiest people it could find, among them Ms. Johnson, who, in 1937, graduated from college in West Virginia summa cum laude at 18. But, for years at the agency, women often worked in separate rooms from men, and the white women were segregated from the black women, who were known as "colored computers." Ms. Johnson's push to be heard by the men — her calculations, once they heeded her, proved invaluable — lies at the film's narrative core.
Photo
A scene from the film "Hidden Figures."CreditHopper Stone/20th Century Fox
"I knew the story was gold," Ms. Gigliotti said.
As did, it seems, most everyone involved in the film.
Ms. Spencer said yes without pause, despite having initially mistaken the script as a work of too-good-to-be-true fiction.
Mr. Melfi ("St. Vincent") heard about the plotline and cursed. At the time, he was deep in talks to direct the next "Spider-Man," and knew he would have to back out because "Hidden Figures" was too good to pass up.
Ms. Monáe found the story a thrilling revelation, albeit a slightly troubling one. "Just think about how many other stories are hidden that we don't know about," she said, speaking from her Atlanta home.
And the hip-hop impresario Pharrell Williams, who grew up near Hampton, and was obsessed by space, clambered aboard, partly by sheer will, after learning about the story from his producing partner.
"She knew I was going to lose my mind upon hearing about it," Mr. Williams said. "And when I did, we got on the phone with everybody, and we begged." He became a producer on the film (other producers on the project include Peter Chernin, Jenno Topping and Mr. Melfi), has written songs for it and is working with Hans Zimmer on the score.
Earlier this month, days before the production wrapped here, Ms. Gigliotti along with the principal cast members squeezed in time between takes to talk about the film.
They were shooting downtown, in the old Georgia Archives building, a looming marble block, nicknamed the White Ice Cube, that was built in the '60s and shuttered after engineers determined it was steadily sinking into the ground. For this film, which also stars Kevin Costner and Jim Parsons, the building was standing in for the Langley Research Center in Virginia. In the fusty air inside, amid snaking cables and extras dressed like squares from 1961, portable air-conditioners fought a mighty and futile battle with Atlanta's wilting heat.
Ms. Gigliotti sat before a monitor, headphones on, glued to a scene being shot in an adjacent room. Kirsten Dunst, who plays a NASA supervisor, was fixing Ms. Henson with an acid stare. "They've never had a colored in here before Katherine," she said coolly, "Don't embarrass me."
Ms. Henson blanched, turned and was about to walk through a nearby door when her handbag got stuck on the doorknob. Mr. Melfi called cut.
"Did I steal that or what?" Ms. Henson asked sarcastically, throwing an expletive in.
The role of Ms. Johnson is a meaty one, as well as a departure, for Ms. Henson, who is coming off the most dazzling year of her career. In January, she collected a Golden Globe for her portrayal of Cookie, the brazen, razor-tongued matriarch on Fox's nighttime soap "Empire."
As grateful as Ms. Henson is for pop culture's adulation of Cookie, she's somewhat weary of being constantly associated with her. (Mr. Melfi has wanted to work with her since her Oscar-nominated turn in "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" in 2008.)
"All of a sudden, it's the Cookie takeover," Ms. Henson said, sitting in a corner-office set piece. "And that's all anyone wants to remember."
She was dressed as un-Cookie-like as could be, wearing a largely shapeless plaid midcentury dress, with her hair set in pin curls. It's hard to imagine a character more different from Cookie than Ms. Johnson, whom Ms. Henson met not long after the mathematician, now 97, received a Presidential Medal of Freedom in November for her contributions to rocket science.
Ms. Johnson, Ms. Henson found, was regal, inward and resolute. "A quiet storm, that's what I call her," Ms. Henson said.
The part challenged Ms. Henson in unexpected ways. She fizzes with energy, and containing it all to play Ms. Johnson left her exhausted at day's end. She used moments between takes as release valves, breaking into impromptu dances and letting her wit rip.
She also labored, fruitlessly, to understand Ms. Johnson's intricate calculations, going so far as to skip Beyoncé's May 1 concert at the Georgia Dome to do her math homework. "It makes my heart palpitate, the math," she said.
It was an aversion she shared, to a degree, with Ms. Spencer, who happens to like basic math but goes blank when it comes to calculus. Luckily for all, Mr. Melfi said, the film is "math lite."
The two women, along with Ms. Monáe, developed deeper bonds during production and know they will all invariably be repeatedly asked about how "Hidden Figures" plays into the broader conversation around diversity in Hollywood. That question caused something close to resignation to come over both Ms. Henson and Ms. Spencer.
"I hate when I do a film, and it has a lot of African-Americans and they call it a black film," Ms. Henson said. "I don't wake up and go, 'Let's see, this weekend, I'm going to see a Chinese film, I'm going see a black film, no I'm going see a white film with a black person in it.' Who does that?"
Ms. Spencer said that labeling the film was not just a turnoff for some audiences, but also unfairly reductive. NASA's largely unrecognized female mathematicians were black and white, she said, and this story, told from the perspective of three black women, paid homage to them all.
"This is a female-driven movie about contributions that women really made, to our world, not just our society," Ms. Spencer said. "That's a big statement."
To reach Zubaan, the feminist press founded and run by Urvashi Butalia, visitors and authors walk through the winding lanes of Shahpur Jat.
This is one of Delhi's older urban villages.
The crisp window displays of fashion and furniture shops have learned to coexist with small home industries and pragmatic grocery stores, sturdy glass jars of crumbling salty biscuits displayed on their formica counters, as neighbourhood children play ferociously good cricket in the narrow alleys.
Everyone in the lanes leading up to Zubaan knows the "Publisher Didis" office; there are no daunting glass-fronted entrances, no watchful doormen to keep the press apart from its neighbours. Inside, the walls are lined with an assortment of bookcases - metal, wood, glass-fronted, open-shelved - containing an equally eclectic history of women's lives and feminism in India.
Zubaan, founded in 2003, is Urvashi Butalia's second publishing venture: in 1984, she set up India's first feminist publishing house, Kali for Women, with the scholar and publisher Ritu Menon. Taken together, these two publishing houses contain the collective memory of much of the Indian women's movement - written in memoirs, biographies, fiction, academic studies, histories, and more.
In the 1980s, anti-dowry agitations and campaigns against domestic violence and rape focused attention on the high numbers of women for whom marriage was a battlefield, often a deadly one.
The late 1980s was marked by the campaign against the resurgence of sati after 18-year-old Roop Kanwar burned herself on her husband's pyre, and agitations against legislation that significantly weakened the rights of Muslim women in divorce cases.
The 1990s saw the rise of Dalit feminism and a greater focus on caste inequalities and gender, growing concern over the practice of female foeticide and infanticide.
Among grassroots groups, long-running battles over basic healthcare, land reform, forest access rights, fishing rights and other issues fed into labour and environmental struggles all through the 2000s.
Concerns over the growing acceptability of violence against women - in their homes, in workplaces and public spaces, in conflict zones, by fundamentalist and communal forces - fed directly into today's ongoing debates on women's freedoms and the attempts to truncate those freedoms in the name of safety.
Through these tumultuous times, Zubaan and Kali for Women functioned also as archivists and as participants in the organically evolving network of disparate groups that formed the Indian women's movement.
"We're putting together an archive of the interviews we've recorded with authors, organisers, women on the front lines," Urvashi says.
Recorded over the decades, these will be an invaluable oral history of Indian women, many of them far more focused on getting the job done in any given moment than on chronicling their thoughts.
A very exciting time
The roots of Urvashi's feminism stretch back to her childhood. She was born in 1952, and grew up in the town of Ambala in Punjab, moving to New Delhi in 1961.
Her mother ran the house and taught in college, earning the modest sum of Rs 300; she also gave her children a brisk understanding of their father's gambling problem from an early age. These were the post-Partition decades; Mrs Butalia had to handle a constant flood of relatives and extended family. "The hospitality of the household was extended to anyone who visited," Urvashi says. "I worried about the burden she carried."
Urvashi's grandmother lived with them. She was "conventional, saw her daughter-in-law as someone to be oppressed, an upstart who had arrived with no dowry".
At mealtimes, she insisted that the men - uncles, brothers, cousins - would be served first. But in the afternoon when the old lady was asleep, the girls would steal the keys to the large tin trunks where she stored dry snacks - papads, shakkarpadas.
"My mother encouraged us to help ourselves. She said that there was no way her girls were going to eat less in her house. I didn't have a word for it, I didn't know the word 'feminism' then, but I learned from my mother that there was nothing natural about discrimination, and that it had to be fought."
One of Urvashi's favorite pictures, taken with her "Ma" Subhadra Butalia who she says was about 81 at the time and had just published a book called 'The Gift of a Daughter' [courtesy Urvashi Butalia]
Urvashi went to college in Delhi. In the 1970s, Delhi University provided an excellent introduction to the real world of politics. The peasant revolt of 1967 in Naxalbari had jolted West Bengal and the rest of India, and campus discussions revolved around the politics of class struggle. Many left to join grassroots movements that tackled issues invisible to urban India. The women's movement in India was putting down roots.
"We discussed feminism, we were naïve but intense," Urvashi recalls. "But Delhi University was in the grip of Naxalbari, it was a hotbed of political discussion. Friends of ours often disappeared" - dropping out of their studies - and "got involved at a deeper level."
This was a far better education than the one provided by the antiquated, colonial syllabus.
"Milton and Spenser" - the 16th and 17th century English poets whom undergraduates were supposed to study - "had nothing to do with the sexual harassment we faced every day on the roads, on the buses."
Urvashi and her friends began to question the basics of college life in India. It was a confusing time - she remembers participating as a "fresher", a new student, in a beauty contest. "Our seniors made us wear saris, high heels - we walked the ramp, but I remember feeling something wasn't quite right there."
My mother encouraged us to help ourselves. She said that there was no way her girls were going to eat less in her house. I didn't have a word for it, I didn't know the word 'feminism' then, but I learned from my mother that there was nothing natural about discrimination, and that it had to be fought.
Urvashi Butalia
There were more pressing problems. Conditions for women students were deplorable; their presence on campuses only grudgingly tolerated. Men had more freedom, more space - a far greater number of hostel rooms were allocated to male students - and more relaxed curfews, discriminatory practises that continue to this day. Urvashi stood for student elections, representing her college, the all-women Miranda House.
They campaigned successfully for separate buses for women (segregated Ladies Specials, intended to allow women to travel without fear of assault or stalkers), and managed to ease some of the restrictions on women hostellers' movements around and outside campus.
Urvashi's generation of women were inspired by many activists, academics and thinkers whose history of engagement stretched back to the days of the Indian nationalist movement - Vina Mazumdar, Leela Dubey, Lotika Sarkar, Vimla Farooqui and many others.
This was also the decade when women's groups started to band together.
"In Delhi, we were talking to and helping women deal with dowry cases, working on landmark changes in the laws with the Law Commission. I don't know how we ran campaigns without the Internet, without working landlines; women wrote letters, went by bus to different towns. It seems incredible now."
In 1974, the scholars Vina Mazumdar, Kumud Sharma, and CP Sujaya released a landmark report, Towards Equality. Urvashi learned a valuable lesson from the Indian educationist JP Naik, who told the group to immediately hold a press conference when releasing the report, rather than allowing political or government interference.
It was the first post-Independence document to address women and their rights, and it set the template for the Indian women's movement over the next few decades. "It was very exciting - a very full time," Urvashi recalls.
Breaking into a man's world: publishing
She had finished her Master of Arts, and it was expected that she would take up teaching - one of the few jobs considered suitable for women in that era. It was hard to imagine becoming a publisher, in a world where women didn't join or run publishing houses.
"But I had dreamt of becoming a printer," Urvashi says. "I wanted to print political pamphlets for friends in various movements."
So Urvashi joined Oxford University Press (OUP) on Ansari Road, located in Daryaganj in Old Delhi, at that time home to many academic publishers and secondhand bookstores, as a "paster-upper".
The OUP's Active English series, produced in Hong Kong, needed to be Indianised for local schools - publishing houses, run for many decades by English men, were slowly Indianising. "My job was to replace 'John & Mary' with 'Ram & Sita'." She worked alongside an artist, Dean Gasper, who coloured blonde hair black, and painted over the tops of double-decker buses - most Indian cities had only single-deckers. Within four months, she was "completely in love" with publishing.
Then she landed a real job in the production department and began visiting all the printing presses - some in central Connaught Place, others located in relatively distant colonies such as Mayapuri, in West Delhi. Many presses - the venerable Thomson Press, the Rekha Press - were not used to women making the rounds, especially not women in their twenties.
Her boss, Adrian Bullock, insisted that she learn as much as she could about book production. "When the presses found that I was knowledgeable about printing, I received a little grudging respect," she says. "And invitations to coffee at Rambles in Connaught Place, which I steadfastly declined!" For women in the workplace in the 1970s, fending off unwanted and often unprofessional male attention in an age before sexual harassment rules were instituted was, unfortunately, a common hazard.
She liked getting her hands dirty, liked the smell of printer's ink; it meant a lot to have the approval of printing veterans like ML Gupta at Indraprastha Press, who said she was a veritable "ustad" or "master" of printing. Her next bosses, Charles Lewis and then Ravi Dayal, were equally open and generous. She spent a lot of her time in the paper market, Chawri Bazaar, in Old Delhi as well: "Those six years gave me a very solid start."
Looking back, though, there was a limit to what Urvashi could learn from her male bosses. "They were so helpful in shaping me as a publisher," she says.
Bullock insisted that she learn how to do costings; she discovered that she had a flair for calculations, the intricate business of paginating editions, working out paper and printing costs, print runs. Ravi Dayal generously gave her projects to edit when she said she thought she'd like to do some editorial work.
'I'll do it myself'
"But it was also the fact that they never considered women worth publishing that made me more determined to start my own house," Urvashi says.
One of her bosses asked: "But what do women write?" when she raised the subject.
He was not being condescending. "They literally didn't see women as authors, didn't see women's writing. I thought, if they can't do it, I'll do it myself."
Meanwhile, India was heading into one of its most turbulent periods: Indira Gandhi imposed a state of emergency that lasted from 1975 to 1977, declaring that there was a threat to national security, after she had faced a case accusing her of electoral malpractices and her government had faced strikes across trade and student unions.
Fundamental rights were suspended; the media was heavily censored, and in the clampdown on basic democratic freedoms, many were imprisoned, while a rash of forced sterilisations and slum demolitions spread unrest across India.
They literally didn't see women as authors, didn't see women's writing. I thought, if they can't do it, I'll do it myself.
Urvashi Butalia
Urvashi was away, working in OUP's cartography department in the UK. She was staying in the London home of Charles and Premila Lewis.
Charles headed OUP at the time and Premila, a social worker, had been organising labourers and encouraging them to demand basic rights on the farms of Mehrauli, which included one of Mrs Gandhi's properties.
She went back to India from London in 1976 and was arrested as soon as she got off the plane; she would be held in prison for several months.
But though the state clamped down on many political parties, women's groups were by and large allowed to function. "They arrested and sometimes tortured women who belonged to the radical Left, Maoists, but they didn't bother with the others," Urvashi recalls. "We saw what was going on. It fuelled our politicisation."
Urvashi was part of the original collective that came together in 1976 to form Manushi, widely seen as India's first progressive feminist magazine in English.
In Urvashi's recollection, the intentions behind the collective of 18 women, brought together by Vina Mazumdar, were powerful. But with little experience of collective functioning, petty problems surfaced, and the original group soon disbanded.
What she learned from that experience was valuable, though. "We had come together to solve the problems of women, but we never talked about ourselves. It came slowly, the intimacy of sharing, the daily practice of understanding your own privilege and class issues."
Collecting women's own histories
By the 1980s, the Indian women's movement - massive, diverse, made up of groups with very distinct concerns - had begun to grapple with the relative absence of their own written histories. "There was so much published in the West," Urvashi says. "It was a comfort to have that, but it didn't explain what we were confronting on the ground." When they explored dowry killings, for instance, they began to see how these demands and deaths served a functional purpose: they were a way for Indian families to get the capital needed for small businesses, white goods, and home expansions.
Did dowry affect only Hindus, was the practice restricted to the north of India, was it a middle-class phenomenon? The answers were complicated. When families declared that the giving and taking of dowry was voluntary, it raised thorny issues around agency. "We had always seen agency as desirable, but what if women used their agency to demand or enforce violence towards other women?"
Urvashi began to talk about starting her own publishing house: "We needed answers to these questions. The books grew out of this need to collect our own history."
We had always seen agency as desirable, but what if women used their agency to demand or enforce violence towards other women?
Urvashi Butalia
On her way to Hawaii on a Fulbright scholarship to do a PhD, she stopped in London and met friends at Zed Books, a dynamic academic press that specialised in politics, development and gender. An old friend there asked her why she was going to Hawaii: "You can't swim, you can't surf." Instead, they suggested she spend two years working with them.
During that time, she commissioned and edited books and authors for a special list on gender for Zed. The contacts she made in the international publishing world would prove very useful later, when Kali for Women and Zubaan needed to sell rights. In the early 1980s, the scholar Ritu Menon wrote to her, asking if she was looking for someone to collaborate with.
Urvashi returned to Delhi, with plans for Kali for Women alive in her mind. That evening, she stepped out to water the plants on her roof. The gulmohar trees had flamed redly into full bloom and she remembers thinking, "I've come home."
Ritu's husband painted their makeshift office in the garage yellow and white; the two of them rattled around Delhi, meeting authors, in Ritu's sturdy black Ambassador car. The books started to come out - a collection of short stories by women called Truth Tales, in seven different Indian languages, compilations of women's popular songs and protests, a history of the Telangana movement in the south, and radical explorations of the past from a gendered perspective. "We were happy, unpaid, inspired. Those were the better days," she says.
An inside view of Sharir ki Jaankari (About the Body), an educational booklet published in 1989 by Kali for Women, continues to sell in the thousands in ration shops and gender workshops [courtesy Zubaan]
One of her favourite books from that time is a profoundly influential booklet called Sharir ki Jaankari (About The Body), published in 1989. "I was still wrestling with doubt - was I fooling myself that I was contributing with this publishing business, away from the movement? In retrospect, this was the most important book we published."
Kali for Women developed a warm and loyal following among women over the years. One day, a group of women dropped by their office - rural women from Rajasthan, bearing a beautiful, handmade, practical booklet on the body. They had tested the book in their workshops. The original version featured an anatomical illustration of a naked body, and the villagers laughed at them: in which village would you see a woman (or a man) roaming around naked?
In the final version, a woman is drawn in a lehenga. Cut-out panels have been pasted on; when you lift them up, you can see the breasts, the abdomen, the uterus, and the same for the man's body. Seventy-five women contributed; all 75 names are listed on the cover. The book continues to sell in the thousands, but has never been sold in bookshops - it's distributed through ration shops, gender workshops, local outlets. "The women had one condition: if we published it, every copy sold to a village woman had to be sold at cost price," says Urvashi.
The other problem they encountered was unexpected. Their regular printer in Old Delhi came to them apologetically, saying he could not print the book - the young boys who worked in his printing press were growing "overexcited". Instead, one of Urvashi's colleagues located a women's printing collective in another part of Delhi, who were able to contain their excitement. They printed it under the condition that they would receive a special box of sweets for every completed print run.
In between the busy humming grind of the publisher's life, Urvashi found time to write a major history of Partition, conducting interviews with dozens of women over a decade for The Other Side of Silence, which came out in 1998. She tried hard when she spoke to Damayanti Sahgal, Kamlaben Patel, Basant Kaur, her mother, other women who had survived Partition - almost all of them now dead - to build trust, to withhold judgement. Many had never shared their experiences. There had never been a history of the 1947 Partition of India, in which over a million people died and 12 million more were displaced, from the point of view of women.
"It was very moving, but also tragic and sad to see how society tries to silence women in so many ways, and wonderful to see how women subverted this and made themselves heard." Among their families, they were guarded, but if she joined them in satsangs, gatherings of song and prayers held in gurdwaras, she found they could speak more freely.
Zubaan
After 19 years in partnership, Kali for Women's founders finally parted ways in 2003. Ritu Menon went on to found Women Unlimited, and Urvashi started Zubaan Books - the word means "tongue" and "language" in Hindi - in the same year. Zubaan has a wider catchment area than Kali had. Urvashi publishes children's books, mainstream fiction and translations as well, though women's lives and histories remain at the core of her work.
Baby Halder, photographed in July 2006, worked as a domestic servant in Delhi for many years, writing about the struggles in her early life in between her chores [Getty Images]
Four years after Zubaan opened its doors, Urvashi published a book that would change the fortunes of the author as well as those of the firm. Baby Halder's memoirs, A Life Less Ordinary, was a bestseller that crossed urban India's rigid class barriers - Halder had worked for many years as a domestic servant, writing in exercise books in between rounds of sweeping, cleaning, and making tea.
"We had been able to publish marginal voices, not as subjects to be reported on, but as the ones speaking out. The book changed her life, for better and worse - it gave her a house, helped her to educate her children, but once you've moved out of poverty, class in India is not so easy to transcend." Baby Halder is still writing; she's moved to Mumbai where she is a hostel supervisor for a woman's group. "It's a delicious irony to me that a book written by a poor woman could help turn our fortunes around," Urvashi says.
Butalia published Baby Halder's 'A Life Less Ordinary' [Getty Images]
Lunch at Zubaan is an egalitarian meal where everyone congregates at the table, the conversation flowing in busy eddies. Right from the start of her publishing career, recognising the burden many women carry as they juggle domestic chores and office work, Urvashi made it a rule that lunch will be provided by Zubaan, freshly cooked by Nirmala, the office canteen supervisor or one of the other women.
A print of Botero's plump Mona Lisa smiles benignly down at the team on one side; the Rajasthani artist and women's right activist Radhaben Garva's bright, intelligent art blesses Zubaan from the other wall.
After her active life in the women's movement, what changes does she see ahead?
In her view, urban Indian feminism has moved from the street level activism of the 1980s into institution-building, as modes of resistance change; crucially, affirmative action at the village level has brought far more women into political power in rural India.
Urvashi Butalia at Zubaan, the feminist press she founded and runs in Delhi [Showkat Shafi/Al Jazeera]
Women's agency
Perhaps the big shift, Urvashi says, is that the issues and choices are more complex, no longer black and white. "Women are much more aware of the greys - the debates we've had over religion, communalism, sex-selective abortion, supposed free choice, have made women think harder about these things. For example, there was a time when we assumed women's agency was an unmitigated good, until women's claim to religious identity and all that comes with it, including communalism, made us see otherwise and question our own assumptions."
As Urvashi analyses these shifts, you start to see the Indian women's movement as a dynamic work-in-progress, rather than a monolith.
"There are also changes in the relationship of women's groups to the state," she says. "There's a realisation that sometimes you have to work with the state. At other times, you might confront it and battle with it, but the relationship need not always be oppositional.
"There's a lot of questioning of the movement from within and discussions about whether or not the movement has excluded women of 'alternative' sexualities, or lower caste women, or whether it has been too majoritarian, too urban."
All of this is something she views as beneficial, even necessary. But after a lifetime of engagement, Urvashi also sees the vastness of the Indian women's movement. "There is so much more - how to put it all together?" she writes in an email, looking for and then finding the words.
"Though women still remain second-class citizens in our country, they're no longer standing outside the door hoping someone will see them, instead they are demanding to be let in and listened to."
Nilanjana S Roy is the author of two novels, The Wildings and The Hundred Names of Darkness; her essays on reading, The Girl Who Ate Books (HarperCollins), are out this December.
She has written on gender, free speech and the reading life for the Business Standard, The New York Times, the BBC, Outlook and other media organisations. She lives in New Delhi.
You can follow Nilanjana on Twitter at @nilanjanaroy.